Showing posts with label George Washington Cable. Show all posts
Showing posts with label George Washington Cable. Show all posts

Sunday, August 22, 2010

"True stories are not often good art": Some comments on Strange True Stories of Louisiana

An undated photo of the Delphine Lalaurie House, on the corner of Royal and Governor Nichols streets in New Orleans. Image found here. This house is the setting for Cable's story, "The 'Haunted House' in Royal Street" (which you can read online here.

Recently, I posted some comments on literary regionalism's potential for indulging in a cultural provincialism that, as nostalgia, is basically harmless but can help feed the social anxieties of some to the point of heightening their resistance or outright hostility toward the nation's political institutions. As I noted in that post, a fair amount of Southern fiction from the Jim Crow era participated in that feeding. But a Southern writer I could/should have mentioned in that post who kind of passively-aggressively resists that impulse is George Washington Cable. Here, I'll briefly seek to make amends by saying a few words about his story collection, Strange True Stories of Louisiana.

More below the fold.

Back in December of 2008, I posted here on Cable's best-known novel, The Grandissimes; if reading that interests you, you may enjoy this post over at Domestic Issue. As you'll see in that first post, I was initially skeptical of those people who see in Cable a precursor of Faulkner, but I've since come around to their way of thinking: Both writers deeply loved their regions and its people, but that love didn't blind either to those regions' flaws--most particularly to the fact that both regions' codes (legal, social, economic . . . take your pick) were predicated upon maintaining the moral outrage of slavery and, afterward, segregation. Cable's writing leans stylistically toward a stilted sentimentality in his narratives, but I and others suspect that that is a marketing decision rather than a direction in which he was naturally inclined. It's just such a style that pervaded the local colorist writing of the time. But Cable's readers--especially his Southern ones--could tell he was no moonlight-and-magnolias apologist. Indeed, as the Castillo piece I just linked to relates, Cable, whose family was so staunchly Southern that they left New Orleans when General Benjamin Butler's Union army took control in the spring of 1862 (more about Butler's rule in New Orleans here), would fall out of favor with his fellow Southerners for his (for the time) direct criticisms of slavery and segregation.

Lots of background, I know, but it's to purpose. When I started reading "How I Got Them," Strange True Stories' lengthy introduction, in which Cable relates to his reader how these stories--diary entries, letters, rough drafts of memoirs, etc.--came to be in his possession, I confess to thinking, Sure these are actual stories. His rendering, via large gaps in the text on the page, of the original documents' missing corners and his inclusion of lithographs of actual letters and diaries only heightened my skepticism. How very proto-postmodern, I thought. His tone in "How I Got Them" kept reminding me of Hawthorne's tone in "The Custom-House," his preface to The Scarlet Letter, to the point that I felt sorry that ol' Nate hadn't thought to work up a lithograph of Hester's "A" to include. More reading, though, assures me that actual people did indeed send these to Cable or, just as he describes, he and his agent would hear of these pieces and track them down through surviving relatives of their authors.

But I'm not telling you about this book because of its stories' origins in actual events in New Orleans and southern Louisiana for the hundred or so years from its early days as a French colony to the Civil War. Rather, what is of interest is how Cable has given these stories a sense of unity that causes this collection to be more than a simple assemblage of vignettes. In fact, it reminded me a little of Faulkner's Go Down, Moses: each has stand-alone sections linked, mostly, by recurring characters (some recur in the sense that they're referred to indirectly); and the sections don't appear in chronological order. (Cable's book is more strictly chronological, but "Alix de Morainville" is the story of the titular character's past in France during the Reign of Terror, a past she alludes to in the preceding story, "The Adventures of François and Suzanne"; meanwhile, the last narrative, "War Diary of a Union Woman in the South," follows after a couple of stories set during Reconstruction.) More subtly, though, whereas with Faulkner's novel it is the House of McCaslin that is haunted by slavery's legacy, the (almost literal) and thematic center of Strange True Stories is a literal house--the one in the image at the beginning of this post--which is haunted by slavery and segregation, certainly thematically and, perhaps, literally as well (note my source for the image).

"The 'Haunted House' in Royal Street" is actually two stories. The first concerns Madame Delphine LaLaurie, quite the socialite in her day, and the city's outrage when it was revealed that her rumored brutal treatment of her slaves was indeed true; the second is about the house's second life during Reconstruction as an unsegregated school for girls that, with the change in government, is forced to send away its black students . . . if only there were a way to determine who is indeed black that isn't more than a little socially and politically awkward. By themselves, they really wouldn't amount to much. But Cable, I think it's safe to say, sees in these stories something more, as the following passage from early in the story suggests, in which Cable describes the view from the second-story belvedere over the street:

I was much above any neighboring roof. Far to the south and south-west the newer New Orleans spread away over the flat land. North-eastward, but near at hand, were the masts of ships and steamers, with glimpses here and there of the water, and farther away the open breadth of the great yellow river sweeping around Slaughterhouse Point under an air heavy with the falling black smoke and white steam of hurrying tugs. Closer by, there was a strange confusion of roofs, trees, walls, vines, tiled roofs, brown and pink, and stuccoed walls, pink, white, yellow, red, and every sort of gray. The old convent of the Ursulines stood in the midst, and against it the old chapel of St. Mary with a great sycamore on one side and a willow on the other. Almost under me I noticed some of the semicircular arches of rotten red brick that were once a part of the Spanish barracks. In the north the "Old Third" (third city district) lay, as though I looked down upon it from a cliff--a tempestuous gray sea of slate roofs dotted with tossing green tree-tops. Beyond it, not far away, the deep green, ragged line of cypress swamp half encircled it and gleamed weirdly under a sky packed with dark clouds that flashed and growled and boomed and growled again. You could see rain falling from one cloud over Lake Pontchartrain; the strong gale brought the sweet smell of it. Westward, yonder, you may still descry the old calaboose just peeping over the tops of some lofty trees; and that bunch a little at the left is Congo Square; but the old, old calaboose--the one to which this house was once strangely related--is hiding behind the cathedral here on the south. The street that crosses Royal here and makes the corner on which the house stands is Hospital street; and yonder, westward, where it bends a little to the right and runs away so bright, clean, and empty between two long lines of groves and flower gardens, it is the old Bayou Road to the lake. It was down that road that the mistress of this house fled in her carriage from its door with the howling mob at her heels. Before you descend from the belvedere turn and note how the roof drops away in eight different slopes; and think--from whichever one of these slopes it was--of the little fluttering, befrocked lump of terrified childhood that leaped from there and fell clean to the paved yard below.


As you can see, Cable isn't engaged here in straight objective description as he provides some foreshadowing of events in the first act of the story. But I'd also argue that there's something even more literary at work here. The house is at once a vantage point from which to survey the "strange confusion" of New Orleans and, as we'll see via the two acts, something like the apotheosis (or perhaps a vortex?) of that confusion. But this house, as a space whose stories seem to be about more than the particulars of the physical space within which those stories occur, also appears to be not just the center for Strange True Stories but also a gathering of images and narratives for Cable as a writer. I don't yet know enough to say more, but I do know that Cable borrows the name Delphine for a character in his story collection, Old Creole Days, and another story in that same collection appears to be an expansion on an incident briefly alluded to in "Haunted-House"'s second act.

The other stories in Strange True Stories vary in their quality; with one exception, I won't be writing about them for the book project. As glimpses into the lives of women (the central characters in all these stories are women) of the better-off classes, though, they make for engaging reading; and "War Diary of a Union Woman in the South," disappoints because I wish it were longer: it begins with the woman and her husband feeling compelled to leave New Orleans and ending up in a place where they thought they would be safe from the war: Vicksburg; her descriptions of life in that city during Grant's siege are gripping. But they don't become that something more that lets them signify something larger and more complex. "Haunted-House," though, becomes more than a true story, to the point that it just may haunt you, too.

Read More...

Tuesday, December 09, 2008

"This newly found book, the Community of New Orleans": The Grandissimes

Two illustrations by Albert Herter from an 1899 edition of The Grandissimes (found here). Top: a scene from the masked ball that opens the novel; bottom, the mysterious mulatta and practitioner of voodoo, Palmyre Philosophe.

The jacket copy for the Penguin Classics edition of George Washington Cable's The Grandissimes promises much: "With The Grandissimes, George Washington Cable broke literary traditions and opened the way for novelists such as Thomas Wolfe and William Faulkner." Hmph. But now that I'm approaching its end, I must say that I'm very impressed by it. It wears its (anti-segregation) racial politics on its sleeve, which can be a bit grating to modern ears not accustomed to or appreciative of blatant polemic in our fiction; as a closely-observed study of the dynamics of Creole society in turn-of-the-19th-century New Orleans, however, its wry, even sneaky subtlety requires close, thoughtful reading. Here's a particularly fine example of what I mean:

That same morning Clotilde had given a music-scholar her appointed lesson, and at its conclusion had borrowed of her patroness (how pleasant it must have been to have such things to lend!) a little yellow maid, in order that, with more propriety, she might make a business call. (205)
Here, Cable hopes we are less naïve than Clotilde (about whom more later), the better to muse to ourselves that one person's pleasantness may be another household's source (or incarnation) of just-barely-unspoken tension, if not anger or out-and-out violence. On its surface, then, The Grandissimes is a "local color" novel of the sort from the latter decades of the 19th century under whose considerable numbers and weight now groan the shelves of bookshelves in antique malls across our great land. But if you don't rush through it, you just may find that in places, those colors are pretty saturated. Cable is not the equal of either Jane Austen or Faulkner, but there are moments when he is something like a fusion of the two. Here and there, indeed, I found myself hearing not just echoes of Faulknerian scenes and plots but even little Faulknerian turns of phrase. I would not be at all surprised if I were to learn that Faulkner had read this; on the other hand, though, Cable is writing about a place Faulkner already knew well as both an amateur historian of the South and as a resident of the French Quarter during his bohemian days in the early to mid-'20s--when, by the way, Cable was still alive (he died in 1925). Cable's world was still very much in Faulkner's air.

More below the fold.

The novel's narrator makes clear again and again that the New Orleans he is describing has now (that is, in the 1870s-1880s) all but disappeared. That New Orleans is the Crescent City of the first decade of the 19th century--a city literally, as well as figuratively, another country. In those uncertain years when, having just been returned to the French by the Spanish, the city, and all of the land drained by the Mississippi River, have just been sold to that upstart foreign nation, the United States. But though Cable's Creoles most often speak either French or a patois among themselves, neither do they think of themselves as French. One character speaks in passing of another person's having been "ruined" as a result of having been educated in Paris. The old Creole families, long used to running their own political and economic affairs pretty much as they had seen fit, realize that to keep any of their power they will have to acquiesce to with this new order and even ally themselves with it--and yet, to save face among their fellow citizens, they will have to create the illusion that they have done no such thing.

What causes even more consternation among the Creoles, however, is the anxiety surrounding what the "Americains" will do about the practice of slavery in Louisiana. That anxiety, the deeper knowledge, not to mention guilt, among the more thoughtful Creoles that slavery is profoundly unjust (not just for obvious reasons but for the further complication that many of these white men have blood relatives forbidden by law to inherit family property because they are of mixed race), combined with a profound resistance to criticism from outsiders, all combine to form the thematic gumbo at this novel's core. The family from whom the novel takes its name, as the most prominent of the Creole families, are Exhibit A for all these tensions: two of its members, in fact, share the name Honoré . . . but one cannot share in the family's wealth. Oh, the tangled roots of those plantation-family trees.

Helping to stir up this gumbo for the reader's benefit is Joseph Frowenfeld, the one surviving member of his family, the rest of whom died from yellow fever shortly after their arrival in New Orleans when he was a boy. Joseph stays on and trains as an apothecary, but he is still seen as an outsider: the Creoles think of him as an American but respect his learning; the mulattoes and slaves think he is a voodoo priest (this serves to make Frowenfeld something of a counterweight to Palmyre); you get the idea. He is something like a re-writing of James Fenimore Cooper's Natty Bumppo, a man with feet firmly planted in two worlds, sympathetic and even loyal toward both, yet able to see the faults of each, not afraid to point out those faults. It is his "perusal of this newly found book, the Community of New Orleans" that forms The Grandissimes' central plot:
True, he knew he should find [that perusal] a difficult task--not only that much of it was in a strange tongue, but that it was a volume whose displaced leaves would have to be lifted tenderly, blown free of much dust, re-arranged, some torn fragments laid together again with much painstaking, and even the purport of some pages guessed out. Obviously, the place to commence at was that brightly illuminated title-page, the ladies Nancanou. (103)
Those ladies are Aurora and Clotilde, a well-born mother and her young daughter who no longer have a financial means of support and, when the novel opens, are about to lose their house for non-payment of the rent. Clotilde and Joseph will become rather awkwardly attracted to each other, and that story forms the novel's marriage plot. It gives nothing away to tell you All's well that ends well; this genre doesn't lend itself well to tragic endings.

Fans of American literature as a field of study will like this novel: not initially knowing what to expect as I began reading, I enjoyed spotting the Faulknerian portents. Those of you with a soft spot for N'awlins will enjoy its sepia-toned treatment of the city. But this novel is no mere nostalgia trip. What is most impressive about The Grandissimes is Cable's clear-eyed portrayal of Creole New Orleans. He is clearly fond of its people and the land they inhabit, but he also makes sure that we admire their stubborn adherence to tradition even as we see that that same stubbornness will doom them to a genteel irrelevance as the world around them changes whether or not they like it. Even though the Creoles of the novel would not think of themselves as Americans in a political or cultural sense, they certainly will strike contemporary readers as a people and culture this continent produced. It is probably for that reason that the novel still feels fairly contemporary. Its characters' preoccupations are still our own, for better or for worse.

If you're interested, I have some further, wonkier comments on Cable's novel over at Domestic Issue.

Read More...